You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The present halofit code (power.py) does not introduce any fnu correction. Notice that this correction is coded differently in CCL and CLASS. Here is the CLASS comment
pk_halo = a*pow(y,f1*3.)/(1.+b*pow(y,f2)+pow(f3*c*y,3.-gam));
pk_halo=pk_halo/(1+xmu*pow(y,-1)+xnu*pow(y,-2))*(1+fnu*0.977);
/* until v2.9.3 pk_halo did contain an additional correction
coming from Simeon Bird: the last factor was
(1+fnu*(0.977-18.015*(pba->Omega0_m-0.3))). It seems that Bird
gave it up later in his CAMB implementation and thus we also
removed it. */
// rk is in 1/Mpc, 47.48and 1.5 in Mpc**-2, so we need an h**2 here (Credits Antonio J. Cuesta)
CCL implements the (1+fnu*(0.977-18.015*(pba->Omega0_m-0.3))) factor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The present halofit code (power.py) does not introduce any fnu correction. Notice that this correction is coded differently in CCL and CLASS. Here is the CLASS comment
CCL implements the (1+fnu*(0.977-18.015*(pba->Omega0_m-0.3))) factor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: