Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Checking non-active branches #2

Open
ChristophWWagner opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Checking non-active branches #2

ChristophWWagner opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested

Comments

@ChristophWWagner
Copy link
Member

Branches that have been committed into can also be out-of-date with respect to origin. If a branch exists at the remote location it would be nice to know if we have unpublished commits resting in any branch that is (i) also known to another remote and (ii) that we have commits of (or are behind that particular origin).

As larger projects tend to accumulate loose ends in form of leftover local branches one could easily forget something there.

I am proposing of reporting the above case by default with pingit status and to optionally extend the scope pingit pull to all available (and matching by-name) branches with an additional flag.

Please comment on this proposal.

@ChristophWWagner ChristophWWagner added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested labels Jan 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants