Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

created different sections for misc #6641

Conversation

japneetsingh035
Copy link

What does this PR do?

Add info | Improve repo
Fixes: #6518

For resources

Description

Why is this valuable (or not)?

Improves sections divisions

How do we know it's really free?

For book lists, is it a book? For course lists, is it a course? etc.

Checklist:

  • Read our contributing guidelines
  • Search for duplicates.
  • Include author(s) and platform where appropriate.
  • Put lists in alphabetical order, correct spacing.
  • Add needed indications (PDF, access notes, under construction)

Follow-up

  • Check the status of GitHub Actions and resolve any reported warnings!

@japneetsingh035 japneetsingh035 marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2021 04:25
@LuigiImVector LuigiImVector added the 🚀 ready to merge LGTM. Waiting for final approval label Dec 13, 2021
@eshellman
Copy link
Collaborator

in the rest of the repo, we've used subheadings:

Math

Algebra

in stead of

Math - Algebra

Any reason to do it differently here?

* [DSL Engineering: Designing, Implementing and Using Domain-Specific Languages](http://dslbook.org) - Markus Voelter
* [How to Design Programs](http://www.htdp.org)
* [Microservices AntiPatterns and Pitfalls](http://web.archive.org/web/20210205164251/https://www.oreilly.com/programming/free/files/microservices-antipatterns-and-pitfalls.pdf) - Mark Richards (PDF) *(:card_file_box: archived)*
* [Microservices vs. Service-Oriented Architecture](https://www.oreilly.com/radar/microservices-vs-service-oriented-architecture/) - Mark Richards (HTML)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wounld people looking for microservice architecture think to look in "design patterns"? I wouldn't.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made some changes based on your comments. Please review them and let me know if this will solve the issue. I will try to improve more. Thanks for the suggestions.

@eshellman
Copy link
Collaborator

it's a good idea to break up your work one section at a time so that one issue doesn't hold up everything. for example, the section of digital signal processing is ready to go as is, while other thing may attrct wider comment. Give each PR a subject so that people who are domain experts can weigh in on their subject and ignore the others.

@LuigiImVector LuigiImVector added 👀 Needs Review Is this really a good resource? Reviews requested. and removed 🚀 ready to merge LGTM. Waiting for final approval labels Dec 24, 2021
@davorpa davorpa requested a review from eshellman December 27, 2021 16:53
@eshellman
Copy link
Collaborator

Please start afresh, one reorg at a time. The different math sections should be subsections of a mathematics section. many of you categorizations are inappropriate. "Communications" is a confusing subject heading.

@eshellman eshellman closed this Dec 27, 2021
@EbookFoundation EbookFoundation locked as off-topic and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 28, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
👀 Needs Review Is this really a good resource? Reviews requested.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

big sections are ripe for division
3 participants