We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The setting isn't honored, would be handy though.
We have:
This would currently mean that the rewrite table would have 300k * 10 * 5 = 15m rows (all hidden products are currently added as well).
300k * 10 * 5 = 15m rows
If issue #8 would be solved and the 'Use Categories Path for Product URLs' setting is implemented we would have 100k products * 10 = 1m rows.
100k products * 10 = 1m rows
Since less rows is always better, this would be a big win.
I could make some modifications to the script my self if you'd be willing to accept a pullrequest?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Any pointers perhaps where I should look to fix this my self? My tables are getting out of control at this moment (and performance is bad).
Sorry, something went wrong.
! Add fix for issue #9
75aa9cb
Try this change. If helps - close the ticket.
This fixes it!! Thanks!
No branches or pull requests
The setting isn't honored, would be handy though.
We have:
This would currently mean that the rewrite table would have
300k * 10 * 5 = 15m rows
(all hidden products are currently added as well).If issue #8 would be solved and the 'Use Categories Path for Product URLs' setting is implemented we would have
100k products * 10 = 1m rows
.Since less rows is always better, this would be a big win.
I could make some modifications to the script my self if you'd be willing to accept a pullrequest?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: