Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

mark additions in readings #471

Open
peterstadler opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

mark additions in readings #471

peterstadler opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
docType:letters bugs and features related to the display of letters and other correspondence material docType:writings bugs and features related to the display of writings enhancement

Comments

@peterstadler
Copy link
Member

@solveigschreiter reported:

Bei den Apparateinträgen werden die adds im rdg nicht gekennzeichnet, sondern als Normaltext wiedergegeben, sodass bei Abweichungen mitunter ein gleicher Sachverhalt in den verschiedenen Textzeugen steht

Bsp.: in A042308 "für geraume Zeit", "gütigen" etc.

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-06 um 16 02 03
@peterstadler
Copy link
Member Author

How should that be displayed?

@riedde
Copy link

riedde commented Jun 10, 2024

I have this problem concerning stamps where I would need two levels of pop-ups for the rendering. I'm thinking of another way of rendering (using highlights), but don't have a solution yet.

@peterstadler peterstadler added docType:letters bugs and features related to the display of letters and other correspondence material docType:writings bugs and features related to the display of writings labels Jun 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docType:letters bugs and features related to the display of letters and other correspondence material docType:writings bugs and features related to the display of writings enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@peterstadler @riedde