Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to evaluate correctness and errors in multiple-choice tasks? #2529

Open
WuXnkris opened this issue Dec 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

How to evaluate correctness and errors in multiple-choice tasks? #2529

WuXnkris opened this issue Dec 1, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@WuXnkris
Copy link

WuXnkris commented Dec 1, 2024

"gen_args_0": {
"arg_0": "Question: a shopkeeper sold an article offering a discount of 5 % and earned a profit of 31.1 % . what would have been the percentage of profit earned if no discount had been offered ?\nAnswer:",
"arg_1": " 38"
},
"gen_args_1": {
"arg_0": "Question: a shopkeeper sold an article offering a discount of 5 % and earned a profit of 31.1 % . what would have been the percentage of profit earned if no discount had been offered ?\nAnswer:",
"arg_1": " 27.675"
},
"gen_args_2": {
"arg_0": "Question: a shopkeeper sold an article offering a discount of 5 % and earned a profit of 31.1 % . what would have been the percentage of profit earned if no discount had been offered ?\nAnswer:",
"arg_1": " 30"
}

............
"filtered_resps": [
["-7.680142164230347", "False"],
["-17.299633383750916", "False"],

Why are there two gen_args, and why are the resps numerical values?
How can we determine the correct answer generated by the LLM?
How to get the model’s original response?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant