Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look into adding non-linear dimensionality reduction preprocessors #298

Open
rhiever opened this issue Oct 28, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Look into adding non-linear dimensionality reduction preprocessors #298

rhiever opened this issue Oct 28, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@rhiever
Copy link
Contributor

rhiever commented Oct 28, 2016

Most of the feature preprocessors that we use are based on linear methods. We should look into adding non-linear dimensionality reduction preprocessors, such as:

@kadarakos
Copy link
Contributor

This paper http://bit.ly/2gbuKey suggests that non-linear dimensionality reduction techniques fail to improve upon PCA in natural data sets; it actually has KernelPCA in the comparison. Since PCA is super fast compared to KernelPCA and other non-linear techniques I would vote against including non-linear stuff.

@rhiever
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhiever commented Nov 28, 2016

That's very surprising. I bet we could find some examples where those findings don't hold.

@saddy001
Copy link

To get a first insight one could include non-linear preprocessors, run TPOT for 2-3 standard datasets and look into the best pipelines, if any of those preprocessors were included.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants