Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CIS doesn't gracefully handle 503 error from F5 #3766

Open
avinashchundu9 opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

CIS doesn't gracefully handle 503 error from F5 #3766

avinashchundu9 opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@avinashchundu9
Copy link

Setup Details

CIS Version : 2.19
Build: f5networks/k8s-bigip-ctlr:latest
BIGIP Version: Big IP v17.1.1.3
AS3 Version: 3.52
Agent Mode: AS3
Orchestration: K8S
Orchestration Version:
Pool Mode: Cluster/Nodeport
Additional Setup details: Rancher/Calico network

Description

When F5 is replying back with 503 error due to high CPU/memory usage or when CIS post large declarations. CIS still keeps posting configuration and makes the problem even worst

Steps To Reproduce

  1. Post large declarations to F5 until it get busy.
  2. Check logs on CIS you will notice 503 error but CIS still try to post every 30 sec.

Expected Result

CIS to handle these issues more gracefully. Having incremental posting will help during issues not only for error 503 but also other issues. Post 30sec->60sec->120sec->240sec... Posting incrementally during issues or when F5 is busy will help handle problem better and gives time for F5 to recover.

Actual Result

Posting every 30 sec's.

Diagnostic Information

<Configuration files, error messages, logs>
Note: Sanitize the data. For example, be mindful of IPs, ports, application names and URLs
Note: The following F5 article outlines the information required when opening an issue.
https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K60974137

Observations (if any)

@avinashchundu9 avinashchundu9 added bug untriaged no JIRA created labels Feb 26, 2025
@trinaths
Copy link
Contributor

Created [CONTCNTR-5239] for internal tracking.

@trinaths trinaths added JIRA and removed untriaged no JIRA created labels Feb 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants