Replies: 1 comment
-
hi @jonquet - thansk for the heads up on this. This is a good point. I think we are going with the option of deriving from dcat:Resource (even though we will still use the distribution property, so by reasoning, mod:SemanticArtefact will be a dcat:Dataset) so this should be OK |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Since MOD 1.4 Schema.org (SDO) has added the notion of DefinedTerm and DefinedTermSet (another word for semantic artefact I believe).
We are going to need to review the metadata properties of this object.
Things inherited from CreativeWork and Thing were already integrated in MOD1.4 which assume an ontology was a sdo:Dataset
Note with respect to #34 => we might have a conflict when aligning our DCAT MOD2 approach with Schema.org.
@agbeltran : DCAT3 is aligned to sdo:DataSet and if we decide a mod:SemanticAretfact is a dcat:Dataset we are going to have an issue of alignement with Schema.org in which the relevant class is now sdo:DefinedTermSet which is disjoint from sdo:Dataset
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions