You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In issue #242, we have decided to add an option to include analysis to the proposedEvidenceReference` data type.
In issue #244, we have decided to add an option to include analysis to a SourceDescription.
It would be my understanding that we also need an option to include analysis in one other place [assuming changes proposed in #244 are adopted] — in the top-level specializations of Conclusion, meaning Person, Relationship, Event and PlaceDescription.
I would define this analysis member more or less as follows (what a "conclusion" is called is under discussion on #244):
Description: A reference to a document containing analysis about this conclusion.
Data type: URI
Constraints: OPTIONAL. If provided, MUST resolve to an instance of http://gedcomx.org/v1/Document of type http://gedcomx.org/Analysis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In issue #242, we have decided to add an option to include
analysis to the proposed
EvidenceReference` data type.In issue #244, we have decided to add an option to include
analysis
to aSourceDescription
.It would be my understanding that we also need an option to include
analysis
in one other place [assuming changes proposed in #244 are adopted] — in the top-level specializations ofConclusion
, meaningPerson
,Relationship
,Event
andPlaceDescription
.I would define this
analysis
member more or less as follows (what a "conclusion" is called is under discussion on #244):http://gedcomx.org/v1/Document
of typehttp://gedcomx.org/Analysis
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: