Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

OSGi dependency on relaxng should be optional #85

Closed
coheigea opened this issue Oct 7, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

OSGi dependency on relaxng should be optional #85

coheigea opened this issue Oct 7, 2019 · 4 comments
Milestone
6.0.2

Comments

@coheigea
Copy link
Contributor

coheigea commented Oct 7, 2019

There is a dependency in OSGi on relaxng, which should be optional.
coheigea added a commit to coheigea/woodstox that referenced this issue Oct 7, 2019
@coheigea
OSGi dependency on relaxng FasterXML#85
b455d5f
@coheigea
Copy link
Contributor Author

coheigea commented Oct 7, 2019

PR: #86

cowtowncoder added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 7, 2019
@cowtowncoder
Merge pull request #86 from coheigea/relaxng
3165db1 
OSGi dependency on relaxng #85
@coheigea coheigea mentioned this issue Oct 7, 2019
Merged
@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder added this to the 6.0.2 milestone Oct 7, 2019
@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder changed the title OSGi dependency on relaxng OSGi dependency on relaxng should be optional Oct 7, 2019
@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Will try to release 6.0.2 soon, to resolve possible issue with OSGi usage.

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Just released 6.0.2, should get to Maven Central in an hour or so.

@coheigea
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the fast turn-around!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
6.0.2
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@cowtowncoder @coheigea