Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fork performance #18

Open
FedorLap2006 opened this issue May 10, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Fork performance #18

FedorLap2006 opened this issue May 10, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@FedorLap2006
Labels
enhancement Improvement of a system component/feature optim Performance improvement

Comments

@FedorLap2006
Copy link
Owner

FedorLap2006 commented May 10, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Currently sys_fork just copies the directory recursively, which is not efficient, if we're talking on OS scale.
The solution for this would be implementation of COW pages, but to implement these correctly the support of virtual memory areas (vm_area) is needed.

Useful links
@FedorLap2006 FedorLap2006 changed the title sys_fork is not efficient Fork performance Jul 3, 2022
@FedorLap2006 FedorLap2006 added enhancement Improvement of a system component/feature optim Performance improvement labels Jul 3, 2022
@FedorLap2006 FedorLap2006 self-assigned this Jul 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@FedorLap2006 FedorLap2006

Labels
enhancement Improvement of a system component/feature optim Performance improvement
Projects
DepthOS
Status: WIP
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@FedorLap2006