Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uninhabited Houses on 1911 Census #1756

Open
cmahoneynz opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Uninhabited Houses on 1911 Census #1756

cmahoneynz opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@cmahoneynz
Copy link

Can we have a look at allowing uninhabited houses/buildings to be entered on the 1911 census.

Was told that they were excluded as there were not supposed to be uninhabited houses on 1911. However on a 1911 piece that I had someone start transcribing today has six pages complete with schedule numbers, but nothing entered on them other than notes from the enumerator which include why the schedule had not been used. And this is not isoloated to this piece or county. Just about every 1911 piece I have looked at across four different counties includes at least one numbered schedule page which has not been filled out.

In addition, if one where to look at the enumeator list of properties for the piece, there are those either unoccupied on the night, or normally not occupied at night which, given any earlier year would have been included as an uninhabited house/building. And I can come up with good reasons on why they should be included.

@PatReynoldsFUG
Copy link

Needs adressing as 1911 being worked on now.

@PatReynoldsFUG
Copy link

Yes, should be included as very helpful (when they are present) for those working on house history, or trying to work out if an unnumbered house with is the same as one in a previous/next census and thus the John Smith as sole occupant is the same John Smith as the occupant in another census with slightlly different details.

@PatReynoldsFUG
Copy link

Needs review to agree what is to be done to implement this.

@cmahoneynz
Copy link
Author

Inclusion can also explain what would otherwise be missing schedule numbers.

Another important reason on why they should be there is that it can give a better indication of where business's are. For example, one Nottinghasm 1911 piece I looked at had quite a high number of people working for a particular manufacturing company (which I could not find when checked on Google). Being a factory not normally occupied at night, they were probably not given a census form to return, but included in the enumeator's summary of all the address's contained in the piece is the location of the factory

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants