We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is there any good reason to not provide function signature typedefs inside public headers and have them scattered around examples?
display-library/Sample/Display/Display/Adl.h
Lines 20 to 31 in 209538e
display-library/Sample/Overdrive/Overdrive_Sample.cpp
Lines 37 to 70 in 209538e
It seem it would be better for usability to put all typedefs inside adl_sdk.h with ADL_MAIN_MALLOC_CALLBACK:
display-library/include/adl_sdk.h
Line 41 in 209538e
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Is there any good reason to not provide function signature typedefs inside public headers and have them scattered around examples?
display-library/Sample/Display/Display/Adl.h
Lines 20 to 31 in 209538e
display-library/Sample/Overdrive/Overdrive_Sample.cpp
Lines 37 to 70 in 209538e
It seem it would be better for usability to put all typedefs inside adl_sdk.h with ADL_MAIN_MALLOC_CALLBACK:
display-library/include/adl_sdk.h
Line 41 in 209538e
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: