used wrong setting homo sapien and not fly

[Unhingedgene]

How bad is it if I left Augustus set to homo sapiens but am analyzing an obscure fly that is not close to drosophila. It branches far off in phylo-tree. My boss is pissed but it works when compared to RNA-Seq data.

[KatharinaHoff]

This has happened to many of us. Just re-run with the correct species set and compare results. Best of luck!

…

On Sun 18. Apr 2021 at 01:58, Unhingedgene ***@***.***> wrote: How bad is it if I left Augustus set to homo sapiens but am analyzing an obscure fly that is not close to drosophila. It branches far off in phylo-tree. My boss is pissed but it works when compared to RNA-Seq data. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#281>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJMC6JBO4NTXBQV25DCLGV3TJIOCBANCNFSM43DS4OWA> .

[Unhingedgene]

What if its the only setting that finds a gene? Drosophila usually produces no results... It's quite strange.

[KatharinaHoff]

Try BRAKER2 to retrain for your new fly :-)

…

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 2:46 AM Unhingedgene ***@***.***> wrote: What if its the only setting that finds a gene? Drosophila usually produces no results... It's quite strange. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#281 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJMC6JGDENEY5AO4DFYRRCLTJN4ONANCNFSM43DS4OWA> .

[Unhingedgene]

thanks