-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for OpenAPI 3.0 in Cloud endpoint while using ESP-v2 base image #500
Comments
We don't have plan to support it. Please see cloudendpoints/esp#446 ESP only uses very basic fields, http_method and path. We don't validate any message fields. We will not use any new features from 3.0. One workaround is you can use 3.0 in other places, but convert your spec to 2.0 for ESP. |
@qiwzhang |
I linked this request to this issue. |
Ridiculous question, but if asking customers to use an automated converter from OAS3.0 down to S2.0 seems like such a good idea, esp considering that the underlying engine only uses minimal fields, then why on Earth can't Google just put an automated transform "under the hood" from 3.0 -> 2.0, where no one knows and no one frankly cares,, and can actually claim some level of OAS3.0 support all the while providing better support for customers? I mean the ticket linked above was opened over three years ago... Wouldn't that better support the customer? |
Agree w/above - This is a pretty serious requirement to make both Cloud Endpoints and API Gateway serious options. Apigee X is too heavy for some use cases, and these more managed options are seeming outdated. |
Has anyone found an elegant solution yet as to how to use OpenAPI documents based on the OpenAPI 3.0 specification on Google Cloud, ideally managed/serverless? |
We have a requirement where we want to use additional features available in OpenAPI 3.0 but not in OpenAPI 2.0. From the available documentation, it seems like cloud endpoint/ esp-v2 only supports OpenAPI 2.0
We would like to know if there are any plans for supporting OpenAPI 3.0, or its already in development and we will have the support for OpenAPI 3.0 soon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: