-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BigQuery views are evaluated as tables and checking for CMEK #92
Comments
Hi Team, I have the same request regarding external tables. We have a bunch of files in GCS, and the tables are basically the pointers only to the CSV content there. They exists in BigQuery, but the content is coming from an already CMEK protected GCS bucket. Can these type of tables are excluded too? |
Hi, I think you guys have the wrong project. This wouldn’t be the right
support channel to answer those questions.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 06:03 Csaba SÁRI ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Team, I have the same request regarding external tables. We have a
bunch of files in GCS, and the tables are basically the pointers only to
the CSV content there. They exists in BigQuery, but the content is coming
from an already CMEK protected GCS bucket. Can these type of tables are
excluded too?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#92 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALK42F26DYEXSHNLZSMYQ3VDK45LANCNFSM5SNSTCNA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: <GoogleCloudPlatform/inspec-gcp-cis-benchmark/issues/92/1087356454@
github.com>
--
--------
Aaron Lippold
***@***.***
260-255-4779
twitter/aim/yahoo,etc.
'aaronlippold'
|
I'm sorry if this was some misunderstanding. I was running this benchmarks against our GCP projects, and received false alerts on BigQuery tables for missing CMEK on resources, where I cannot assign keys because they are views, or external tables. |
Hi Team,
I was scared first that our DEVs are messed up something, but then I found during the investigation that the check are running on views/materialized views and during the runtime we are failing on them:
Can you please exclude the views from the checks itself? Thank you in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: