Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User Registration Add-on - Allow user activation on the View #2076

Closed
3 tasks done
rafaehlers opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2180
Closed
3 tasks done

User Registration Add-on - Allow user activation on the View #2076

rafaehlers opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2180
Assignees

Comments

@rafaehlers
Copy link
Contributor

rafaehlers commented Jun 10, 2024

  • Add User Activation field type to GravityView that shows ONLY WHEN User Activation is set to Manual
  • On the front-end, output the output from GF_Pending_Activations::add_pending_activation_meta_box()
  • Make it an AJAX link so that page refresh isn't needed

@omarkasem When you start working on this, please ask for access to the User Registration Add-On in Slack.

At this moment, it's only possible to manually activate a user from the backend on the form settings.

image

The idea is to activate users directly from the View on the front end.

image

@rafaehlers
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zackkatz
Copy link
Member

@crbdev What other things would you want to see here?

@crbdev
Copy link

crbdev commented Oct 22, 2024

@zackkatz I think @rafaehlers covered it 👍

mrcasual added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2024
…#2180)

- Implements #2076
- Adds User Activation field type to GravityView that shows ONLY WHEN
User Activation is set to Manual
- Makes it work using ajax in multiple and single views

💾 [Build
file](https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/unlqo74nnxaf3n7tk6zej/gravityview-2.32-a0e94414b.zip?rlkey=56k1uhus33smpxjiigydi5dha&dl=1)
(a0e9441).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants