Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: storage, layout, and devices (mostly cartesian) #1880

Open
1 of 5 tasks
romanc opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 5 tasks

refactor: storage, layout, and devices (mostly cartesian) #1880

romanc opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
gt4py.cartesian Issues concerning the current version with support only for cartesian grids. gt4py.next Issues concerning the new version with support for non-cartesian grids. module: storage Related to storage subpackage priority: low Low priority task

Comments

@romanc
Copy link
Contributor

romanc commented Feb 20, 2025

Description

PRs #1843 and #1867 raised a couple of questions regarding storage, layouts, and device support/handling on the cartesian side. This is a collector issue in which I'd like to group a couple small PRs and maybe have discussions around these refactors.

So far, we've identified a potential for improvement in the following areas:

Consider this as a low-priority wish list for refactors on the side.

@romanc romanc added gt4py.cartesian Issues concerning the current version with support only for cartesian grids. gt4py.next Issues concerning the new version with support for non-cartesian grids. module: storage Related to storage subpackage priority: low Low priority task labels Feb 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
gt4py.cartesian Issues concerning the current version with support only for cartesian grids. gt4py.next Issues concerning the new version with support for non-cartesian grids. module: storage Related to storage subpackage priority: low Low priority task
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant