Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Thanks very much for letting us know about this problem. I researched your question and learned that the prior leads of MeSH RDF disabled GitHub issues not realizing that they would lose all pre-existing issues, i.e., they thought the existing issues would remain available/visible but that no new issues would be allowed to be entered. At that time, users were asked to send help requests to an internal service at https://support.nlm.nih.gov/, which is still in use. That said, the programmer who set up this GitHub account is no longer working at NLM, and while I am currently a co-lead for MeSH RDF, I am not an owner of this account. If I can discover who owns the account, I will see if issues can be re-enabled so that you can at least see and perhaps copy the ones you need - although we do not want to encourage anyone to put any new MeSH RDF issues in GitHub. Creating a public archive for old GitHub issues may be a reasonable suggestion, but we will need to investigate all options. In addition, you should know that MeSH RDF is basically static at this point in time except for annual updates, which are available to download from https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ I'm sorry for the inconvenience this has inadvertently caused. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Am a big fan and user of MeSH RDF. I love the great docs and that the project is on GitHub. We make use of the project heavily in https://github.com/related-sciences/nxontology-data.
I just noticed that it appears GitHub Issues have been disabled for this repo. And possibly discussions enabled in their place? Unfortunately, this took all existing issues offline. For example, our code links to the following issues which are now offline:
Would it be possible to re-enable issues, as there are likely 100s of hours of work captured by these issues and they form an important part of the scholarly record? If the goal is to not allow new issues, perhaps there's a way we could export a public archive of all existing issues?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions