Need to know the real performance of kernel_coherencies

[benvanwerkhoven]

The current performance benchmarks for kernel_coherencies assume there are only point sources in the sky map. We need a realistic dataset to test with in order to measure the performance of kernel_coherencies on real data. In particular a data set with with a representative distribution of different models of objects in the sky, including points, gaussians, disks, and rings. Only then, we can see if more work needs to be done to avoid the possible divergence that could lead to performance issues with real data.

[HannoSpreeuw]

After that the fs5 crash Kees Verstoep replied to me that John Romein would announce something about the use of fs5. That announcement never reached me. However, I just tried and fs5 seems to be working properly.
So I can start generating real data.

Just now, Kees Verstoep wrote:
"Ik denk dat een algemene aankondiging er bij John bij in is geschoten;
meestal betreft het bij het DAS-5/ASTRON ook een beperkt aantal lokale gebruikers.
Maar het goede nieuws is dat de fs5 headnode gelukkig binnen een paar dagen
gerepareerd kon worden en het systeem weer goed bruikbaar is.
"

[HannoSpreeuw]

Latest push to real-data branch uses real data.