You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the long run, rather than having our custom transforms for data cleaning (as suggested b y #13), it would be better to leave it to a relevant third party, such as OpusFilter.
I'm mostly opening this issue for discussion and as a long-term project rather than expecting this to be handled soon.
As far as I can tell, one would need:
a contribution to OpusFilter to allow it to read and write through piping (or selecting some other tool that allows cleanup through piping)
a transform to handle passing the data from our iterators to the third party software for cleaning and back into the system:
booting a pipe in the warmup method
implement apply through e.g. a popen.read`
a graceful closure when training ends.
(optionally) a deprecation of current filters if their are no longer needed or redundant.
Note that there are several challenges ahead: in particular,
one will have to find a way around sub-process creation in multi-node settings
it's unclear how much effort would be required to implement the required behavior on the third party side (OpusFilter or other).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the long run, rather than having our custom transforms for data cleaning (as suggested b y #13), it would be better to leave it to a relevant third party, such as OpusFilter.
I'm mostly opening this issue for discussion and as a long-term project rather than expecting this to be handled soon.
As far as I can tell, one would need:
warmup
methodapply through e.g. a
popen.read`Note that there are several challenges ahead: in particular,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: