Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supporting frameworks within apps #38

Open
benilovj opened this issue Oct 30, 2011 · 5 comments
Open

Supporting frameworks within apps #38

benilovj opened this issue Oct 30, 2011 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@benilovj
Copy link
Member

I've added support for using frameworks in your apps (see commit 47839be). By default, these live in the "frameworks" folder and get copied into the bundle.

It's in its own branch right now. Is this worth pushing into master?

@ghost ghost assigned ferrous26 Oct 30, 2011
@ferrous26
Copy link
Member

Hmmm...my only problem with this is that there is no hinting at this feature until you look in the App::Specification documentation.

Adding some kind of support for embedding other frameworks is something I want for HotCocoa 0.7, perhaps CocoaPods support or something like that, and this is definitely moving in the correct direction.

@benilovj
Copy link
Member Author

Hmmm...my only problem with this is that there is no hinting at this feature until you look in the App::Specification documentation.

That's fair feedback. Do you think that adding something to the wiki would be sufficient? I've been thinking of starting to enhance the documentation anyway

@ferrous26
Copy link
Member

Sure, high level documentation of the feature would be great.

I'd prefer people to put documentation into the docs/ directory so they can be viewed on rdoc.info (that way we get easy cross referencing of the API documentation), but everybody who has mentioned documentation so far has thought to put things in the wiki. I'm starting to think I should port all the documentation back.

@benilovj
Copy link
Member Author

ok, let's first try with the docs/ directory

On 31 October 2011 16:14, Mark Rada
[email protected]
wrote:

Sure, high level documentation of the feature would be great.

I'd prefer people to put documentation into the docs/ directory so they can be viewed on rdoc.info (that way we get easy cross referencing of the API documentation), but everybody who has mentioned documentation so far has thought to put things in the wiki. I'm starting to think I should port all the documentation back.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/ferrous26/hotcocoa/issues/38#issuecomment-2578116

@ghost ghost assigned benilovj Nov 5, 2011
@staugaard
Copy link

👍 It would be really great to get this in.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants