New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

is_leap isn't as efficient as it should be #6

Open

Validark opened this issue Apr 28, 2017 · 0 comments

Validark commented Apr 28, 2017

This article explains the 100 and 400 modulo checks can be factored down to 25 and 16.

The Date algorithms page should contain this optimization.

Validark changed the title ~~Finding Leap year isn't as efficient as it could be~~ is_leap isn't as efficient as it should be

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment