You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment
Description
When attempting to create an IAM credentials engine in secrets manager using s2s auth, both a s2s auth and an API key auth configuration are created.
api_key field is still required and it does a validity check so I can't feed it a bad key to fail the API key configuration.
If you want to use IAM authorization for the IAM engine, you only need to configure the authorization using the IBM Cloud IAM provider. With an authorization in place, the IAM engine is essentially now configured, you no longer need to also use the SM provider to "configure the engine". Once the authorization is in place you don't need the API key anylonger. See internal IBM Slack for more about this.
Community Note
Description
When attempting to create an IAM credentials engine in secrets manager using s2s auth, both a s2s auth and an API key auth configuration are created.
api_key
field is still required and it does a validity check so I can't feed it a bad key to fail the API key configuration.Terraform CLI and Terraform IBM Provider Version
Affected Resource(s)
Expected Behavior
An IAM credentials engine should be created using service 2 service authorization (because
disabled
is true).Actual Behavior
BOTH a service 2 service configuration and an API key configuration are created.
Steps to Reproduce
Important Factoids
References
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: