You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One example doing counting of artifacts/module in a very large GC project with 1253 contributions containing 25886 modules and total of 6722401 bindings was spending about 50% of the time processing results, sequentially with the queries; if the processing can be done in parallel with the next query that's a significant speedup. Probably doesn't need anything more fancy/complicated than processing in parallel with the next query, but I suppose some more speedup might be possible with a controlled number of queries in parallel, at the cost of server load.
One example doing counting of artifacts/module in a very large GC project with 1253 contributions containing 25886 modules and total of 6722401 bindings was spending about 50% of the time processing results, sequentially with the queries; if the processing can be done in parallel with the next query that's a significant speedup. Probably doesn't need anything more fancy/complicated than processing in parallel with the next query, but I suppose some more speedup might be possible with a controlled number of queries in parallel, at the cost of server load.
-q rdm_types:ArtifactFormat=jazz_rm:Module -s oslc_rm:uses,dcterms:title,dcterms:identifier
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: