Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 22, 2024. It is now read-only.

Add a DID method for this? #17

Open
tyleryasaka opened this issue Oct 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Add a DID method for this? #17

tyleryasaka opened this issue Oct 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
API enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@tyleryasaka
Copy link
Collaborator

For context, I'm referring to the Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) spec. https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-spec/

Probably a bit early, but I think it's worth mentioning: would be great if this could be defined as a formal DID method.

I would be glad to help make this happen.

One example of a DID method: https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rebooting-the-web-of-trust-spring2018/blob/master/topics-and-advance-readings/DID-Method-erc725.md

Current list of DID methods: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-method-registry/

@daviddahl
Copy link
Contributor

Yes. supporting the DID spec is part of the plan, thank you for articulating this here.

I have just been getting versed in much of the DID spec work and various efforts around it. I have a very rudimentary data object right now that collects the hashed pub key, 'peerId', arbitrary namehandle, public key and a set of signed proofs are locally stored, but it does need to be interoperable with other systems.

@daviddahl daviddahl added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 19, 2018
@daviddahl
Copy link
Contributor

daviddahl commented Nov 7, 2018

Wanted to reference @jonnycrunch's https://github.com/jonnycrunch/ipid here as the general concept to follow
also, this looks like an expansion: https://github.com/ipfs-shipyard/peer-star/blob/rfc-identity/docs/rfc-identity.md

@daviddahl daviddahl added help wanted Extra attention is needed API labels Nov 16, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
API enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants