You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 22, 2024. It is now read-only.
Yes. supporting the DID spec is part of the plan, thank you for articulating this here.
I have just been getting versed in much of the DID spec work and various efforts around it. I have a very rudimentary data object right now that collects the hashed pub key, 'peerId', arbitrary namehandle, public key and a set of signed proofs are locally stored, but it does need to be interoperable with other systems.
For context, I'm referring to the Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) spec. https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-spec/
Probably a bit early, but I think it's worth mentioning: would be great if this could be defined as a formal DID method.
I would be glad to help make this happen.
One example of a DID method: https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rebooting-the-web-of-trust-spring2018/blob/master/topics-and-advance-readings/DID-Method-erc725.md
Current list of DID methods: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-method-registry/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: