-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Propose New Constitution or Guardrails Script Governance Action for an offchain discussion and submit it as a governance action #2258
Comments
Description changed |
@bosko-m please double check the name of this option in the dropdown as it should match the GA 'Update to the constitution' |
separate idea > for discussion of this GA we could link to https://constitution.gov.tools/en/interim-constitution |
Yes, the name on 1694 is not always self-explanatory. If you check on the voting page filter you have a more user-friendly name, for now we should align to that |
p.s. for treasury it would be better 'Treasury requests' or 'Treasury withdrawal requests' |
@nebojsact @l-br1 @m-i-k-e Adjusted description so it covers:
Advanced solution with comparison is to be discussed and aligned in #2897 and should also include community feedback on the above. @MSzalowski Once @nebojsact is done with the offchain part only and is deployed to preview we can integrate tx submission too. CC @Ryun1 |
…titution-or-guardrails-script-governance-action-for-an-offchain-discussion-and-submit-it-as-a-governance-action feat(#2258): add support for submitting all governance action types
Notes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: