Skip to content

30x30 land protection implementation in GCAM #499

Answered by pkyle
jangoepel asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

There was a core model proposal a few years ago that revamped how protected lands are handled, so I don't know for sure. Perhaps @kanishkan91 can weigh in.
I believe in constants.R, set

aglu.PROTECTION_DATA_SOURCE_DEFAULT <- TRUE
…
aglu.PROTECT_DEFAULT<- 0.3

Of course that approach would be a global value; assigning this at the regional level would require some revisions to the existing R code. And I don't expect the 30% protection fraction would really drive that much model behavior, as there would still be so much land available for conversion. The old default that we used, 90%, was selected in part because that was the scale of protection that was required to influence the model's beh…

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@jangoepel
Comment options

Answer selected by jangoepel
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants