diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 342c17d..a449b27 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -3,19 +3,21 @@
 > **Warning**
 > This code is at its very earliest stage! It won't do anything useful for a while!
 
-Lazily read petabytes of GRIBs from cloud object storage, as fast as the hardware will allow.
+Lazily read petabytes of [GRIB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GRIB) files from cloud object storage, as fast as the hardware will allow.
 
-This project is inspired by [kerchunk](https://fsspec.github.io/kerchunk/), [VirtualiZarr](https://github.com/zarr-developers/VirtualiZarr), and [dynamical.org](https://dynamical.org). The aim is that opening a multi-petabyte GRIB dataset from cloud object storage should be as simple as:
+This project is inspired by [kerchunk](https://fsspec.github.io/kerchunk/), [VirtualiZarr](https://github.com/zarr-developers/VirtualiZarr), and [dynamical.org](https://dynamical.org).
+
+The aim is that opening a multi-petabyte GRIB dataset from cloud object storage should be as simple as:
 
 ```python
 dataset = xarray.open_dataset(URL, engine="hypergrib")
 ```
 
-`hypergrib` is focused on performance: A virtual machine with a 200 Gbps network interface card in the same region as the data should be able to read GRIBs at ~20 gigabytes per second from object storage. Each load should incur minimal latency. Random access should be as fast & efficient as possible.
+`hypergrib` is focused on performance: A virtual machine with a 200 Gbps (gigabit per second) network interface card in the same region as the data should be able to read GRIBs at ~20 gigabytes per second from object storage. Each load should incur minimal latency. Random access should be as fast & efficient as possible.
 
 The ultimate dream is to be able to train large machine learning models directly from GRIBs on cloud object storage, such as the petabytes of GRIB files shared by the [NOAA Open Data Dissemination](https://www.noaa.gov/nodd) (NODD) programme, [ECMWF](https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/open-data), and others.
 
-Why does `hypergrib` exist? At least to start with, `hypergrib` is an experiment (which stands on the shoulders of giants like gribberish, kerchunk, Zarr, xarray, etc.). The question we're asking with this experiment is: How fast can we go if we "cheat" by building a _special-purpose_ tool focused on reading multi-file GRIBs from cloud object storage. Let's throw in all the performance tricks we can think of. And let's also bake in a bunch of domain knowledge about GRIBs. We're explicitly _not_ trying to build a general-purpose tool like the awesome kerchunk. If `hypergrib` is faster than existing approaches, then maybe ideas from `hypergrib` could be merged into existing tools, and `hypergrib` will remain a testing ground rather than a production tool. Or maybe `hypergrib` will mature into a tool that can be used in production.
+Why does `hypergrib` exist? At least to start with, `hypergrib` is an experiment (which stands on the shoulders of giants like gribberish, kerchunk, Zarr, xarray, etc.). The question we're asking with this experiment is: How fast can we go if we "cheat" by building a _special-purpose_ tool focused on reading multi-file GRIB datasets from cloud object storage. Let's throw in all the performance tricks we can think of. And let's also bake in a bunch of domain knowledge about GRIBs. We're explicitly _not_ trying to build a general-purpose tool like the awesome kerchunk. If `hypergrib` is faster than existing approaches, then maybe ideas from `hypergrib` could be merged into existing tools, and `hypergrib` will remain a testing ground rather than a production tool. Or maybe `hypergrib` will mature into a tool that can be used in production.
 
 Reading directly from GRIBs will probably be sufficient for a lot of use-cases.