Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New package: Gabs v1.0.0 #115623

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

  • Registering package: Gabs
  • Repository: https://github.com/apkille/Gabs.jl
  • Created by: @apkille
  • Version: v1.0.0
  • Commit: 478892ee27728c9fcd91d01d91ab1bd92fc1b72a
  • Git reference: HEAD
  • Description: Simulating Gaussian quantum information in the phase space representation.

UUID: 0eb812ee-a11f-4f5e-b8d4-bb8a44f06f50
Repo: https://github.com/apkille/Gabs.jl.git
Tree: a50597ad08135636b75f1cfae02ff895ad562172

Registrator tree SHA: 191228b6dd8b9d0e2965ae3e705fe54c51dcfee8
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 21, 2024

Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

1. New package registration

Please make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines.

2. AutoMerge Guidelines which are not met ❌

  • Name is not at least 5 characters long

3. Needs action: here's what to do next

  1. Please try to update your package to conform to these guidelines. The General registry's README has an FAQ that can help figure out how to do so.
  2. After you have fixed the AutoMerge issues, simply retrigger Registrator, the same way you did in the initial registration. This will automatically update this pull request. You do not need to change the version number in your Project.toml file (unless the AutoMerge issue is that you skipped a version number).

If you need help fixing the AutoMerge issues, or want your pull request to be manually merged instead, please post a comment explaining what you need help with or why you would like this pull request to be manually merged. Then, send a message to the #pkg-registration channel in the public Julia Slack for better visibility.

4. To pause or stop registration

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add [noblock] in order to unblock auto-merging.

@goerz
Copy link
Member

goerz commented Sep 21, 2024

The name similarity is not an issue, but

Name is not at least 5 characters long

is more problematic (and I can't override it anyway). I would push for a longer, more descriptive name. GaussianBosonicSystems (which I assume is what Gabs derives from) seems perfectly suitable.

It also looks like the documentation is not deployed correctly: the links in the README do not work. It would also be good to add a paragraph or two to the README itself to give some idea of what the package is about, before people continue to the full docs.

@apkille
Copy link

apkille commented Sep 21, 2024

@goerz thanks for the feedback. I'm aware of JuliaRegistries policy of encouraging longer names for clarity even if they seem a little long winded, but GaussianBosonicSystems is pretty long. How about GaussianBosons?

I'll fix the doc deployment and update the README.

@goerz
Copy link
Member

goerz commented Sep 21, 2024

GaussianBosonicSystems is pretty long

Not by Julia standards ;-) But of course, when a package name becomes "too long" is matter of taste.

How about GaussianBosons

Works for me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants