Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Maybe use IIF.Position{2} instead of RoME.Point2 #528

Open
dehann opened this issue Oct 16, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Maybe use IIF.Position{2} instead of RoME.Point2 #528

dehann opened this issue Oct 16, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
API design standardization upstream variableType
Milestone
v0.x.0

Comments

@dehann
Copy link
Member

dehann commented Oct 16, 2021

Avoid name conflict with Julia Geometry packages's Point2 / Point2f etc. Same for Point3
@dehann dehann added this to the v0.x.0 milestone Oct 16, 2021
@dehann dehann changed the title Maybe use Position2 instead of Point2 Maybe use IIF.Position{2} instead of RoME.Point2 Oct 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
API design standardization upstream variableType
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.x.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dehann