-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade MUMPS_jll.jl to v5.7.3 #133
Conversation
c3ba489
to
c81130c
Compare
c81130c
to
be8f639
Compare
@hochunlin |
@amontoison What I did was just track what changes in the MUMPS source code files, xmumps_c.h, and xmumps_struc.h, between 5.6.x and 5.7.x. Then, I made the corresponding change in my I may be able to look into it and make another PR, but since I am in the industry now, I am not sure when I would be available. |
Thanks for your help @hochunlin! Alwo, why are you not direclty using MUMPS.jl in MESTI.jl? |
be8f639
to
6b816b3
Compare
d8fe3e8
to
6e3a203
Compare
@amontoison, I am glad that it helps. I thought back to then; my advisor knows the developer of Also, as with my previous PR, could you help me change |
@hochunlin The issue is that
|
@amontoison, I do not think that it is a mistake in the C header. Just the C header decides to use single precision for It did not throw an error when I changed this in v5.6.x. However, it is safe for me to change it in my branch and test them for now, since it is a specific need on my end. |
The C routines will just fill the bits in the structure after |
No description provided.