You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I had earlier opened this issue in GLM, but I was referred here (See JuliaStats/GLM.jl#543). I noticed that the outputs of GLM might be a bit confusing, mainly due to the fact that the number of digits after the decimal is not fixed. Consider the below case:
I was suggesting, how about fixing the number of digits after the decimal to a certain value, maybe based on the max number of digits in the output. The others could be filled out with 0's. Something like:
I had earlier opened this issue in
GLM
, but I was referred here (See JuliaStats/GLM.jl#543). I noticed that the outputs of GLM might be a bit confusing, mainly due to the fact that the number of digits after the decimal is not fixed. Consider the below case:I was suggesting, how about fixing the number of digits after the decimal to a certain value, maybe based on the max number of digits in the output. The others could be filled out with 0's. Something like:
According to me, this looks a bit more ordered than the previous one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: