Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support for ReinterpretedArray #20

Open
amilsted opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Support for ReinterpretedArray #20

amilsted opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@amilsted
Copy link
Contributor

amilsted commented Jul 6, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Is there any scope for supporting ReinterpretedArray if it is a StridedReinterpretedArray? Not sure it would be performant, but I am thinking about how to implement fully type-inferred array caching (a la TensorOperations, but without having to resort to Dict{...,Any}).
@Jutho
Copy link
Owner

Jutho commented Jul 7, 2022

I guess that could be done, but it's quite a bit harder than the other transformations that preserve stridedness. I guess it would require reimplenting quite a bit of the ReinterpretArray logic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@amilsted @Jutho