We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should C4760 and C6401 be merged? Cf. the similar glosses and references, and the single headword at CD 648b.
If not, what is the distinction?
The redirection entry for ϯϩⲟ on CD 457a may be the source of C4760 based on this sequence: C4759 ϫⲓⲛϣⲧⲉⲙⲑⲓϧⲓ… C4760 ϯϩⲟ v ϩⲟ.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looks like a duplicate to me - @dwerning @simondschweitzer can you remove one of them from CCL?
Sorry, something went wrong.
The dataset for C4760 is now deprecated:
<entry change="#deprecated #v1.3" xml:id="C4760"> <form type="lemma" xml:id="CF11484"> <usg type="geo">S</usg> <orth>ϯϩⲟ</orth> </form> <form xml:id="CF11485"> <usg type="geo">S</usg> <orth>ϯϩⲟ</orth> </form> <gramGrp> <pos>Vb.</pos> <subc>Kompositverb</subc> </gramGrp> <xr type="cf"> <ref target="#C4020" type="entry">give, pay, sell</ref> </xr> <xr type="cf"> <ref target="#C6398" type="entry">face</ref> </xr> <sense xml:id="CS5377"> <cit type="translation"> <quote xml:lang="de">anflehen</quote> <quote xml:lang="en">beseech</quote> <quote xml:lang="fr">supplier</quote> <bibl>CD 648b; KoptHWb 257; DELC 225b; ChLCS 87a</bibl> </cit> </sense> </entry>
No branches or pull requests
Should C4760 and C6401 be merged? Cf. the similar glosses and references, and the single headword at CD 648b.
If not, what is the distinction?
The redirection entry for ϯϩⲟ on CD 457a may be the source of C4760 based on this sequence:
C4759 ϫⲓⲛϣⲧⲉⲙⲑⲓϧⲓ…
C4760 ϯϩⲟ v ϩⲟ.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: