I just changed the base to the demo branch and hopefully maybe didn't break stuff during the rebase.

Come to think of it, that didn't actually make too much sense. I changed to the demo branch because we need to remove some code from the demo so that it can be re-implemented.

But of course that part should be merged to main. I'll try and undo the rebase I just did.

@ll-nick I fixed the git history by

• rebasing my state 1132327
• onto origin/main ae7038e and
• cherry-picking your two commits on top it.

Alrighty, here's a first draft, let me know what you think :)

The tutorial branch is all setup, too.

@orzechow I can't actually add you as a reviewer since you opened the PR. I assume you can give feedback anyway and should you be happy, I'll approve my own changes ;-)

The tutorial quickly starts into the coding part – which I prefer against bloated descriptions 👌

Still, I'm thinking, if we should add a basics section explaining arbitration graphs in general – maybe as a sidelink or so.
IMHO we can't assume visitors are aware of our publication and know the concept.

If short enough, we could add this to the main Readme 🤔

@ll-nick what do you think?

Yes, that is a very good point. I think a short and concise description in the main README would be the very least of what we should do.
In the tutorial introduction, we could also link to a "theory" section where we go more in depth about the concepts, although we could also just link a paper there.

In the tutorial introduction, [...] we could also just link a paper there.

Or paste some paper content in here.

Rebased onto main

I rebased the tutorial branch on top of this one – just to keep a consistent setup (slight changes to CMake or so).

Also, the tutorial did not compile, see fe40628 and 42f2526

@ll-nick Just that you're aware:
Currently the tutorial branch contains some commits that will end up here (by resorting the commits).