Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update modified Vulkan logo for Khronos logo guidelines #6

Open
oddhack opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Update modified Vulkan logo for Khronos logo guidelines #6

oddhack opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@oddhack
Copy link
Collaborator

oddhack commented Jan 30, 2024

Per the logo guidelines we should not add or subtract elements from our logos (even though they are owned by Khronos). @neiltrevett suggests altering the logo on the main page from:

image001

to

image002

Fortunately there is space on the topbar for this. @marty-johnson59 could you ask Dominic (whom I think you said did the current modified logo) to take a swing at this?

N.b. I would look at making the "DOCUMENTATION" part a bit smaller font size, just as an aesthetic preference. We might want to think a bit about how to scale this to other Khronos APIs if they migrate to docs-like Antora sites in the future.

@oddhack oddhack transferred this issue from KhronosGroup/Vulkan-Site Jan 30, 2024
@oddhack oddhack added this to the Needs Triage milestone Jan 30, 2024
@oddhack oddhack added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 30, 2024
@oddhack
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oddhack commented Apr 29, 2024

@marty-johnson59 ping on this - does Dominic have time to do this logo change?

@marty-johnson59
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @neiltrevett, just following up on the logo for docs.vulkan.org. IMO, I think the existing logo looks the best (aesthetically) - but if we're breaking too many rules, I suggest just dropping back to the standard "Vulkan" logo as it fits best on mobile devices (and is non-controversial). LMK if you'd like us to make that change. Thanks

@oddhack
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oddhack commented Aug 5, 2024

My take on this is that it was @neiltrevett's suggestion to begin with and, since there has not been followup from him, we should close this as WONTFIX.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants