Replace webrtc with silero for voice detection #68
MattBrown88
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
RealtimeSTT already uses both. It wouldn't work that well if I restricted to only one of them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Currently, the code uses webrtc to detect voice activity. However, I've found that Silero is much better at filtering out background noise and it does not seem noticeably slower. I'm wondering if we should replace webrtc with Silero in the code shown below. Or give users the option to choose with VAD method to use.
Thoughts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions