You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need some ground rules of what a proposal should look like, this starts with the basics that we don't even see or are being ignored on many chains and can sometimes be dangerous or result in huge discussions while the prop is already voteable and I believe people should not have to go to twitter or discord to find an answer to simple things.
I'd like to make a difference between 3 different kinds of proposals:
- Social Proposals:
These are text proposals that ask for something to be changed, implemented, .... This could be as simple as asking for a feature on the website, a community grand, changing a percentage of something, proposing to work with another project or chain,....
These are proposals that don't call smart contracts (Realms) immediately.
- Executable Proposals:
These are proposals that call smart contracts (Realms) immediately when they pass (or not) and have an immediate effect on chain. For example a community spending prop that will send x amount of $gnot from one address to another, block time changes, ....
- Constitutional Proposals:
These are proposals that ask to amend the constitution of GnoLand. Change the text, add something, ....
- Urgent Proposals:
These are proposals on very urgent matters, in case of an attack on the chain or a project, a vulnerability or bug that's been found, .... I believe that these should have a different governance procedure and maybe even a difference in quorum and who can vote on it.
I believe that all the above (except maybe the urgent proposals) should have at least a minimum set of standard rules, that incase of not being followed by the proposers can actually be a reason for a No with Veto vote. Of course these should be well documented in the governance procedure on the website.
Each different proposal category could have it's own set of extra "rules" of what needs to be included on top of these standards.
I know this was a big chunk to read but I'm trying to explain it as clearly as possible to everyone what we're trying to achieve within this particular discussion.
At the moment we have (this will be edited as people come up with ideas)
What should be included
Known name or usernames from twitter, discord, ....
Some info about yourself
What should not be included
Shortened URL's (Danger of sending people to phishing sites)
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
As I started in short here
We need some ground rules of what a proposal should look like, this starts with the basics that we don't even see or are being ignored on many chains and can sometimes be dangerous or result in huge discussions while the prop is already voteable and I believe people should not have to go to twitter or discord to find an answer to simple things.
I'd like to make a difference between 3 different kinds of proposals:
- Social Proposals:
- Executable Proposals:
- Constitutional Proposals:
- Urgent Proposals:
I believe that all the above (except maybe the urgent proposals) should have at least a minimum set of standard rules, that incase of not being followed by the proposers can actually be a reason for a No with Veto vote. Of course these should be well documented in the governance procedure on the website.
Each different proposal category could have it's own set of extra "rules" of what needs to be included on top of these standards.
I know this was a big chunk to read but I'm trying to explain it as clearly as possible to everyone what we're trying to achieve within this particular discussion.
At the moment we have (this will be edited as people come up with ideas)
What should be included
What should not be included
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions