-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 419
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[K2] Non-existent parameter from KDoc doesn't appear on the implicit primary constructor page #3348
Comments
Is this actual only for nonexistent parameters? |
Should be. If there is a parameter, then it works. The issue is only for implicit constructors. |
The correct behaviour is not defined anywhere, so I've added the kdoc-spec for future reference. |
Should add a warning about unresolved links in params, and keep K2's behaviour. Consider adding additional information to the log that the behaviour in K2 is different than K1. Or mention it in release notes. Blocking:
|
Current state: the only place where we miss unresolved parameters with K2 analysis is when we have implicit primary constructor. |
In K1, the constructor page looks like this:
For K2:
But if I change the class signature to:
the K2 output will be the same.
Installation
Parent: #3328
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: