You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[IMPORTANT!: Please do not edit or reply to this comment using the GitHub UI. You can respond to it using CATcher during the next phase of the PE]
Team's Response
Reason for changing to VeryLow:
Like the issue has stated, the DG has stated that check(xyz) will contain hasCompany(xyz).
In particular, the diagram shown is utilising minimal notation described in the textbook as it does not result in ambiguities (explained right above the diagram).
Items for the Tester to Verify
❓ Issue severity
Team chose [severity.VeryLow]
Originally [severity.Low]
I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your reason]
In the sequence diagram, hasCompany() should be hasCompany(xyz)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: