You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As I understood by inspecting the example of fmi_gym, it is only possible to use one FMU for control in this framework. My aim is to control a battery model exported as FMU, which is located in a large power network. For this purpose, I need my observation space to include quantities outside of the battery FMU. For example, if my battery is located in a bus with a photovoltaic connected (which is also another FMU) to be able to include its power in the observation space.
Is something like that possible? Would it be possible with some modifications?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Kosmylo,
Thank you very much for your comment. You are right, as of now FMI-MLC only supports a single FMU. While this might change in future, I can see a path forward for you. You can wrap the system of FMUs into a single FMU:
This could be done either through an export tool (for example Dymola/Modelica) where you can import your FMUs, link them, and then export the whole system as a single FMU
Or use the Python-based SimulatorToFMU to import and link your FMUs through Python, and then export as a single FMU
As I understood by inspecting the example of fmi_gym, it is only possible to use one FMU for control in this framework. My aim is to control a battery model exported as FMU, which is located in a large power network. For this purpose, I need my observation space to include quantities outside of the battery FMU. For example, if my battery is located in a bus with a photovoltaic connected (which is also another FMU) to be able to include its power in the observation space.
Is something like that possible? Would it be possible with some modifications?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: