Update spack_build.yml to fix cmake pulling llvm #698
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -99,9 +99,9 @@ jobs: | |
| strategy: | ||
| matrix: | ||
| spack_spec: | ||
| - hiop@develop+mpi~raja~shared~kron~sparse ^openmpi | ||
| - hiop@develop~mpi~raja~shared~kron~sparse | ||
| - hiop@develop~mpi+raja~shared~kron~sparse | ||
|
|
||
| # We will need coinhsl for this, but what are the rules for using | ||
| # a coinhsl tarball? | ||
|
|
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ jobs: | |
| cat << EOF > spack.yaml | ||
| spack: | ||
| specs: | ||
| - ${{ matrix.spack_spec }} ^openblas ^cmake~qtgui~ncurses ^libevent~openssl target=x86_64_v2 | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. @nychiang seems like my specification of CMake variant worked for the HiOp package, but not for low level packages like openblas. Do you want me to try and fix this, or can you try and take it from here? There was a problem hiding this comment. I can see what you did change here, and it seems like solving the problem. |
||
| concretizer: | ||
| reuse: dependencies | ||
| config: | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nychiang this build is failing because for some reason it's trying to build
libflame, and notopenblas.Looks at the concretization comparison between builds, and you'll see that a 3 hour build would make no sense for the smallest build of the batch here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why would that spec possibly need python for this build?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
python is required via
hiop -> amdlibflame -> aocl-utils -> doxygen -> graphviz -> gtkplus -> meson -> python-xxx
why do we need amdlibflame? Concretization shows that it installs a lot of packages.
@cameronrutherford