Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make an autoencoder representation #85

Closed
aimalz opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

make an autoencoder representation #85

aimalz opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@aimalz
Copy link
Collaborator

aimalz commented Apr 14, 2022

@villrv the version of qp under active development is actually here. I can't directly transfer your issue, aimalz#98, from a repo under my personal account to a repo in an organization so am making a new one here as a reminder for us to follow up with you for details and add it in soon.

@eacharles
Copy link
Collaborator

I have no idea what this means, could you clarify please?

@eacharles eacharles added the question Further information is requested label Apr 20, 2022
@villrv
Copy link

villrv commented Apr 20, 2022

Yes!! Sorry this was from a conference, in which I was sitting next to Alex - ha! This is a recommendation (please correct me if I'm wrong, Alex!) that the p(z) distributions could be described by low-dimensional vectors, which you would learn via an autoencoder (a type of neural network). So the idea would basically be that some p(z) distribution has ~100 bytes of info, and an autoencoder learns a ~10 byte representation of this, which captures the full distribution.

@eacharles
Copy link
Collaborator

So, basically you are saying we run a really fancy version of gzip on the pdf representation?

@aimalz aimalz added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 12, 2022
@aimalz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aimalz commented Aug 2, 2023

@villrv This issue got closed in some spring cleaning as being too general to be actionable, but if you have a piece of code implementing this parameterization, please leave a comment with it and we can reopen the issue for wrapping that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants