Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I really do not know what to title this, bug or request #85

Open
StormyIceLeopard opened this issue May 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

I really do not know what to title this, bug or request #85

StormyIceLeopard opened this issue May 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@StormyIceLeopard
Copy link

From 1.5.7 to 1.6.2 broke the way we use 2FA.
The way we used 2FA was that it was installed on Waterfall (Proxy) and Lobby (The main landing point to the network, can't join other servers directly except for a select few where joining lobby is not possible due to version compatibility issues).

Then on first join of the network, you are prompted for 2FA on Lobby. Then you were never prompted again until you disconnected from the network, regardless of returning to Lobby or not from other servers on the network.

With 1.6.2 we have 2 options, only get prompted with IP change (or when ever the system decides not to auto authenticate) or every time you join Lobby.
This is not how we want this to work. We want it to ask on network join only then never again until disconnect and reconnect to the network.

Next issue is that now I keep getting spammed in chat that there are timed out communication issues (see image below, ignore the Ice Guardian Prefix that is just what we call our QoL systems for the end users, it is still 2FA)

Why is this getting spammed on every join to Lobby?

image

@DirtyConcept
Copy link
Collaborator

I will be looking into making the 2FA system work differently in 2.0, it will have many more features like auth sessions timeout, network wide 2FA sessions and similar.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants