Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phishing use case - improvement #190

Open
Rafiot opened this issue Apr 7, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Phishing use case - improvement #190

Rafiot opened this issue Apr 7, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@Rafiot
Copy link
Member

Rafiot commented Apr 7, 2021

What is changing?

Right now, we have a weird malicious flag, it needs to go away.

The problem we want to solve is the following:

  • Legitimate site legit.com has a logo, with hash <hash>. The <hash> is not a phishing marker as long as it is on the legitimate site
  • The same hash is present on a site that is not legit.com. In that case, it should be marked as suspected phishing (Logo idea: fish with a question mark)

How will this impact users?

Help them to spot phishing cases more easily.

@quinnnorton
Copy link
Collaborator

create a check box for "suspected resource for phishing attacks (mark as legitimate for this site)" that will allow other sites it appears on to marked as "suspected phishing" based on the hash of the resource. I will need to make a suspected fishing icon, though this probably belongs in a instance annotation tool (vs a capture annotation tool) why am i giving myself more work to do

@stale stale bot added the stale label Aug 6, 2021
@Rafiot Rafiot removed the stale label Aug 13, 2021
@Lookyloo Lookyloo deleted a comment from stale bot Aug 13, 2021
@esellier
Copy link

A perceptual hash may also be interesting (or a more efficient logo recognition API => Google Cloud Vision?), as well as some metadata on images (including XMP).
The main problem is to create the initial Hash DB with logos from all legit sites.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants