Over-zealous 'Field _field is protected' warning in class-created closure functions

[swajj]

How are you using the lua-language-server?

Visual Studio Code Extension (sumneko.lua)

Which OS are you using?

Windows

What is the issue affecting?

Diagnostics/Syntax Checking

Expected Behaviour

Functions created from within class methods should be allowed to access protected (and private) members of that class.

Essentially, any functions inside a class method should inheret that method's access- this is a simple pattern that maintains encapsulation of exactly those private/protected fields, as the code is still clearly "owned" by the encapsulating class.

Actual Behaviour

In some scenarios, functions within class methods that access protected members of that class are being marked with the 'Field _field is protected' warning. See Repro Steps for code sample.

Reproduction steps

---@class DynamicDude
---@field _field string?
local DynamicDude = {}

function DynamicDude:demo()
    self:setup(function(self)
        -- This disable shouldn't be necessary
        ---@diagnostic disable-next-line: invisible
        self._field = 'test'
    end)
    ---@param self DynamicDude
    local function closure(self)
        -- This disable shouldn't be necessary
        ---@diagnostic disable-next-line: invisible
        self._field = 'test'
    end
    self.dynamic_fn = function(self)
        self._field = 'test'
    end
end

---@param fn fun(self:DynamicDude)
function DynamicDude:setup(fn)
    self.dynamic_fn = fn
end

Additional Notes

FEATURE REQUEST: I'd actually love to have a setting that just said "all variables named self are assumed to indicate valid access to private/protected members", to cover all my bases. Happy to dig up some examples / explain myself more if that's useful.

Log File

No response