Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lower jina rate floor #647

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

lower jina rate floor #647

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

Debraheem
Copy link
Member

See: #645

We currently have the default reaclib_min_T9 = 1d-2 (i.e. no reactions below 10 MK) as a MESA default, I would like to bring this down so we are not missing key reactions like li7 and be9 burning.

I have tested with reaclib_min_T9 = 1d-4 (i.e. no reactions below 1d5 K) with no issues, see https://testhub.mesastar.org/EbF%2Flower_jina_rate_floor/commits/8555db8. The testing looks good. I would appreciate any feedback or further testing from any members of the community on this.

I will modify the changelog once we come to a conclusion on this.

@Debraheem Debraheem added release-blocker Things that should be fixed before the next release rates-net Rates and net modules labels May 13, 2024
@Debraheem Debraheem requested review from fxt44 and warrickball May 13, 2024 22:44
@Debraheem Debraheem self-assigned this May 13, 2024
@fxt44
Copy link
Member

fxt44 commented May 13, 2024

i will test after the current test suite run finishes.

@Debraheem Debraheem removed the release-blocker Things that should be fixed before the next release label May 14, 2024
@Debraheem Debraheem marked this pull request as draft May 14, 2024 07:01
@Debraheem Debraheem linked an issue May 14, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
! like rni56ec_to_co56,rco56ec_to_fe56
!write(*, '(a,i4,2x,a)') 'Warning: non-positive value for rate in ', &
! j, trim(reaction_Name(reaction_id(j)))
rate_logR = rattab(j, i) ! don't convert to log space.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I could be misunderstanding what is going on here. Are you saying the data tables (in linear space) have some -1 entries? Then setting rate_logR = -1 could be a problem, no?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rates-net Rates and net modules
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

no burning at lowT, lower the default jina rate floor.
3 participants