Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interpretation of nuclear reaction rates #648

Open
kailicao opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Interpretation of nuclear reaction rates #648

kailicao opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working rates-net Rates and net modules

Comments

@kailicao
Copy link

kailicao commented May 23, 2024

Describe the bug
Please see: https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/2024-May/015184.html

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Make a copy of '$MESA_DIR/data/rates_data/rate_tables/'
  2. Specify rate tables to use in 'rate_tables/rate_list.txt'
  3. Run the model to generate 'rates_cache/' and cache files
  4. Use '$MESA_DIR/rates/test/show_rates' to get a readable version of the rate

Expected behavior

  1. The rate is a smooth function of temperature in log-log space
  2. Some reasonable extrapolation is used beyond the temperature range of the table

Screenshots
Outlook-uu1mhty0
See the email linked above for description.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server
  • Version: 7.9 (Maipo)
@Debraheem
Copy link
Member

Thanks for documenting this! @warrickball mentioned this as a previous issue which was never fully resolved, see #421.

We are discussing it in this thread as well: #645

@Debraheem Debraheem added rates-net Rates and net modules bug Something isn't working labels May 23, 2024
@pmocz pmocz self-assigned this Aug 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working rates-net Rates and net modules
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants